Overpriced Russian DD: get her only if you're a DD main. Fun and unique, would have been a research bureau ship, but WG put her up for coal to avoid the community uproar of a doubloons + RB only combo. Napoli: I don't have her, but she'll be my next coal purchase. If you don't have the Des Moines + legendary, like me, then she's a good/fun ship. She is a mediocre ship, except the radar, but the main issue is that her playstyle is quite boring, as you are forced to camp next to islands. She's good if you like Japanese kiting playstyle, like the Myoko. Yoshino: I have her and I like her, but she's not strong. With HE BBs, you can hit DDs if needed, with this one you feel gimped. She feels over-nerfed because of the long reload and the nerfed damage against DDs. Great fish: sure, a 24 second reload may seem like a long time, but not for the enemy dodging your torpedoes.Marco Polo: I have her and I like her, but she does not worth it.If you have a Umikaze in all this confusion then you simply laugh in torpedo. Does that mean less fun? Absolutely not! The bots are hilariously aggressive and the few players who are in the match get to jostle for the king of the bot crown. You’ll be stuck facing mostly bots in this tier II so a boat with fast reloading torpedoes is a no-brainer.
Tier II Umikaze, A torpedo that can launch torpedos, WOWS, 2021 So let’s release a crafty spread of exploding fish and avoid heavy counterfire while we’re at it. Sure, it’s a game and falls short of realism often, but tactically it emulates a destroyer’s role well. The game’s destroyers, the best examples of which made our list, show the many avenues of attack available to the brave captains in the dark days that peppered our 19th century. World of warships passionately emulates the potential of a 2000lb tube of doom swimming at 60knots. That’s roughly when torpedoes came into their own. That simply means you could fit more guns, armor, and potential for aggression on a battleship.Īdmiring this discrepancy as a child I remember thinking, why even bother with the small ships? And I wasn’t the only one, that’s what many gruff sailers thought in the early 19th century. An average mid-century destroyer displaces a meager 5000 tons of water, a battleship’s average displacement during WW2 was over 20000 tons. When you see a destroyer next to a battleship it’s a dwarfing site.
0 kommentar(er)
